Public and Community Art in the Classroom



Public art is everywhere, you just have to look up. Going on walks down Main Street is one of my favorite things to do. This is because art shows up in so many places. It shows up in architecture, sculptures, landscaping, storefronts, and signs. One of the fun challenges I will have as an art teacher is to expose my students to public artwork and have them create it themselves.

In an article, “Teaching with Public Art” by Carol Argiro, she wrote, “Directly or symbolically, public artworks often refer to local history and local identity.” This is an important thing to point out to students. Public art will sometimes reference what that community is known for. When you go into the town of Mason City, Iowa, you will see art made to commemorate the Music Man film. It is good to bring a community together with art. Now, what about the public art pieces that do the opposite of that?

Current events of the summer involved the destruction of public statutes that were offensive to many people of color. Confederate statues along with Christopher Columbus statues were pulled down following the event of George Floyd’s death. As an artist, I was sad that an artist had to put in all that work just to have it taken down. As a social justice activist, I was pleased to see them go. I mean...all art isn’t made to last forever, right? This brings up the difference between community art and public art that can be addressed in the classroom.

Public art is artwork for anyone to view. I think of community art as a more specific category of it. Community art is made/ viewed in public, but is more focused on the unity of the community, by celebrating diversity. This can be done with powerful messages behind the artwork or even the collaboration of art-making itself. Social practice art may even question social norms and try to bring about positive change in the community. How can we bring these art forms into the classroom?

 In the article, “Instructional Resources: Teaching with Public Art” by Carol Argiro, there are many great examples of ways to observe and think about public art to get the ball rolling. In one of the examples, students looked at Leatherlips, a 10-foot high sculpture of a Wyandot Native American chief, and discussed why it was symbolic. Leatherlips wanted to keep peace with the white settlers when he was alive and was a man known for never breaking a promise. In this lesson, the teacher would ask questions like, “If Leatherlips was alive today, what do you think he would say to your community. They would also discuss the indigenous rock material that his statue was made out of and think about their own indigenous materials. Lastly, they would think about ways public art can serve a community and design a proposal for a sculpture for a specific place in their community.

I want my students to take hold of the idea of bettering a community with public art. It is a big idea they should grasp onto in order to be shaped into caring and hardworking individuals. We have a responsibility as teachers to teach our students that individuals in a community are all different, but will complement each other when working as a whole. John Dewey, a philosopher, psychologist, and educational reformer, had a lot to say about this topic. “The good society was, like the good self, a diverse yet harmonious, growing yet unified whole, a fully participatory democracy in which the powers and capacities of the individuals that comprised it were harmonized by their cooperative activities into a community that permitted the full and free expression of individuality.” he had said. As teachers, we are here to celebrate individuality in a community, and this can be expressed through public art.



 

 

 

 

Comments

  1. Thank you for bringing the Confederate statues into this conversation. Although this is very controversial, it is very important to discuss. I think your mixed feelings as an artist of sadness for the loss and removal of art and as an activist, pleased to see these removed so they know longer represent our views as a country, is a real struggle. It is so hard for many people right now to comprehend. I often say that as our views and understandings change, so must our world. We are not getting rid of these statues, but we are taking them down so that people know that our country has grown and no longer supports these beliefs. Is there still a place for these works? Sure, how about in a museum where they can be used as teaching tools to help others learn from our history. I believe that leaving them up in public, shows we are honoring the beliefs of these people, and to me that is wrong. I know that having this discussion will be important as it very much reflects our country now. Thanks Natalia!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Natalia,
    This is a great post. I really appreciate your discussion about how you would use this information as a tool when you begin teaching. I can tell that you will be able to transfer your knowledge about community, public art, and social practice art to your students because of how you discuss them in your post. In my post, I wrote about community engaged art as if my students would be taking action on a current issue in our communities, and I didn't really consider the fact that community art can simply be a reflection of the community that we live in. The examples that you use to explain your concepts and ideologies (especially the current events) make your post engaging and easy to follow.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Natalia,
    I have to agree with Wendy on this one! I thought it was really important for you to discuss the controversy of the Confederate statues removal in today's society. I think it's important to acknowledge that society is changing in many different ways. I also appreciated your definitions of public art and community art, describing community art as a focus on diversity and creating a unity in the community. Thank you for your thoughts and ideas!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular Posts